...what do you do with passages that seem to suggest, or even explicitly state, that God changes his mind? Let me give you an example.
1 Samuel 15:11, “I regret that I have made Saul king.” And that’s the same passage that God says in verse 29, “And also the Glory of Israel will not lie or have regret, for he is not a man, that he should have regret.” (yea, that seems super-CONFUSING!!) How can God “regret” and be a God that does not “regret” all at the same time?
Let me explain it this way. When my baby cousin was around two, and still developing her speech, she used to ask for her milk by saying, “papum, papum”—don’t worry that’s not a theological term, just baby talk. Sometimes we would even ask her if she wanted milk by saying “papum” back to her. Now, we weren’t trying to add a new word for "milk" in the dictionary, we were just trying to communicate “milk” in a way that was comprehensible to the mind of a two year old child.
Similarly, you might apply the same logic to passages like the one above. Perhaps, God is speaking in terms comprehensible to such finite, small-minded creatures such as us. Saul had earned divine disapproval by his disobedience, and God responds by saying, “If you, the human, ever regretted doing something, then I want you to understand that regret would be the best level of disappointment that I, the transcendent God, have for such sinful disobedience.”
This is what theologians call “anthropomorphic” (big word, I know) language. Basically, it means to attribute human emotions or terms to the transcendent God, who is beyond our mental grasp. Sometimes, when we think we’ve changed God’s mind, could it be that he, who is never subject to change, is trying to relate with people who live in inexplicable, constant change?
Btw, I know that one can be a little deep, so I’d love to clear up any question you have. Comment below.
